Google Gemma 3 on a Form 1040, page 1


Google Gemma 3 hid the income, breaking any financial analysis, and exposed a dependent's name.
For professionals · Investment advisors
A second opinion from Ai can catch what you missed. Cover takes your client's identity out first. Ai gets the figures, not the client.
How it works
Drag the brokerage statement into Cover, then drag the redacted copy into your Ai chat. Get a second opinion while keeping your client's identity private.
Animation: Stock taxes.pdf is dragged into Cover, which replaces each private detail on the page with a label (ACCT_1, NAME_1, SSN_1). The redacted copy is dragged into an Ai chat with a question, and the Ai answers using the labels.
The brokerage statement as the Ai receives it, Stock taxes-redacted.pdf: Form 1099-DIV Dividends and Distributions · Copy B 2025 Recipient’s name [NAME_1] 1a Ordinary dividends $3,412.08 Recipient’s TIN [SSN_1] 1b Qualified dividends $2,980.55 Account number [ACCT_1] 2a Capital gain distr. $1,204.00 +$8,640 Net gain, 2025
Question: Did I net a gain or loss across these accounts?
The Ai's answer: [NAME_1] netted a gain of $8,640. Long-term gains more than covered the $1,215 short-term loss.
Try it on your own document: drop a PDF into Cover for Web and see what it redacts.
Second opinions
Drop the redacted statement into Ai and ask about your client's portfolio.
How risky is this allocation for someone retiring in five years?
Fairly risky. 72% in stocks is a lot for someone five years from retiring.
How much income does this portfolio pay each year?
About $39,600 a year.
How much can they spend each year once they retire at 65?
About $60,000 a year lasts past 95.
How would a guardrails strategy change what they spend each year?
Cut to $48,600 in the down years, raised to $71,200 as the portfolio recovers.
Simulated answers.
Privacy
The document goes to someone else's servers before anything is redacted.
Nothing is uploaded. Personal identifiers are removed before the document goes anywhere.
Why it matters
Benchmark
Few redaction tools show any proof they work. In our tests, most redacted dollar amounts, so Ai can't read the figures it needs for financial analysis.


Google Gemma 3 hid the income, breaking any financial analysis, and exposed a dependent's name.


America.gov PII filter over-redacted the CD holding's details and left the account number exposed.


Apple Intelligence redacted nothing on the page and left every private detail visible.
Tested on 11 real financial documents: every local Ai engine left 8 to 50 of 74 private details visible. Cover left 0.
See how Cover's redaction engine hides your personal information vs the best local Ai engines
Yes. It's the responsible way to do it: the client's names and account numbers come out before an Ai reviews the statements, and nothing is uploaded.
Yes. There's no page limit. A longer document just takes longer.
Not on its own. It's one control: it keeps client details out of the Ai and off other servers, and your compliance team decides how it fits.
Yes. Redact them before the first meeting, and the Ai works from labels instead of the prospect's names and account numbers.
More: Tax notice · Bank statement · Medical records · Investments · Lease · Mortgage · Cover vs Adobe Acrobat
For professionals: For attorneys · For HR teams · For FOIA and public records · For tax preparers
Opening checkout with your email filled in.